Few national heroes have fallen from grace as dramatically as Ben Roberts-Smith. The former SAS soldier, once celebrated with a Victoria Cross, was found by a civil court to have committed war crimes in Afghanistan. Now he faces five murder charges and a criminal trial that could reshape Australia’s reckoning with its special forces legacy.

4 related posts

Allegations of war crimes: 5 murder charges ·
Defamation trial verdict: allegations found substantially true ·
Appeal outcome: dismissed ·
Military decorations: Victoria Cross, Medal for Gallantry ·
Current legal status: arrested April 2026

Quick snapshot

1Allegations
2Legal proceedings
  • Defamation trial (2020–2024) (Banco)
  • Verdict in favor of allegations (Banco)
  • Appeal dismissed 2025 (Banco)
3Personal life
  • Married Emma in 2007 (Banco)
  • Separated 2019 (Banco)
  • Current partner unknown (BBC News)
4Military career

The table below sets out the core biographical and legal facts that frame the Roberts-Smith story.

Field Value
Full name Benjamin Roberts-Smith
Born 1 November 1978
Service branch Australian Army (SAS)
Highest award Victoria Cross
Number of murder charges 5
Defamation trial outcome Allegations found substantially true
Appeal outcome Dismissed
Arrest date 7 April 2026

The pattern: a decorated soldier’s public record now stands in direct opposition to the legal findings against him.

What are the allegations against Ben Roberts-Smith?

Specific war crimes alleged

  • Justice Anthony Besanko found on the balance of probabilities that Roberts-Smith committed or was complicit in the murder of four Afghan men: two at Kakarak (Whiskey 108) in 2009 and two at Darwan and Chinartu in 2012 (Banco (Australian court reporting service)).
  • A subsequent criminal investigation by the Australian Federal Police (AFP) and the Office of the Special Investigator (OSI) resulted in five murder charges, as reported by BBC News (UK public broadcaster).
  • The West Point Lieber Institute (Lieber Institute at West Point (military law analysis)) described the civil findings as confirming Australian war crimes in Afghanistan in a libel context.

Number of murder charges and other counts

The BBC report from April 2026 states Roberts-Smith was arrested and charged with five counts of murder as war crimes (BBC News). The charges also include other alleged serious offences such as assault and intimidation of witnesses, though the detailed count remains sealed at the pre-trial stage.

Timeline of alleged incidents in Afghanistan

  • 2009 (Kakarak): Two Afghan men killed during an operation known as Whiskey 108 (Banco).
  • 2012 (Darwan and Chinartu): Two further deaths, with Roberts-Smith found complicit (Banco).
  • The alleged crimes occurred while Roberts-Smith was a patrol commander in the SAS Regiment.
Bottom line: The civil court identified four specific murders at two distinct locations across multiple tours. The criminal case now alleges five murders, adding one more death to the tally confirmed in the defamation ruling.

The implication: the criminal charges extend beyond what the civil court already established.

How did the allegations against Ben Roberts-Smith come to light?

Role of whistleblowers and media investigations

  • Whistleblowers – former SAS soldiers whose names were partly redacted or anonymised during the trial – provided accounts that formed the basis of the media reports (Banco).
  • Journalist Nick McKenzie of The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald led the investigation. The Full Court later rejected Roberts-Smith’s attempt to retry the case based on alleged misconduct by McKenzie (Banco).
  • 7NEWS Australia reported that lawyers for Roberts-Smith described the allegations as “egregious and spiteful” while he maintained his innocence (7NEWS on YouTube (commercial news outlet)).

The 2018 media reports and defamation lawsuit

In 2018, The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, and The Canberra Times published reports alleging war crimes. Roberts-Smith sued for defamation, launching the civil trial that began in 2020. As ABC News (Australian public broadcaster) reported, the defamation case ultimately backfired when the media’s defence of truth succeeded.

Criminal investigation by AFP and OSI

After the civil verdict, the AFP and OSI escalated their investigation. The BBC noted that Roberts-Smith was arrested on 7 April 2026 and that the case remains at a pre-trial stage (BBC News). Judge Greg Grogin estimated the case could take years before a trial (BBC News).

The catch

The defamation verdict was civil – decided on the balance of probabilities, not beyond reasonable doubt. Yet those same findings now underpin criminal charges that carry far higher stakes.

The pattern: what began as a defamation lawsuit by Roberts-Smith has become the evidentiary foundation for a criminal prosecution.

What happened between Ben Roberts-Smith and his wife?

Marriage to Emma Roberts-Smith

Roberts-Smith married Emma in 2007, according to court documents from the defamation trial (Banco). The couple had two children.

Separation and divorce details

The relationship broke down around 2019, as the war crimes allegations became public. The divorce was finalised in 2021 (ABC News).

Current relationship status

Roberts-Smith’s current partner is not publicly known. No name has appeared in court filings or media reports since the divorce.

The trade-off

For readers tracking his personal story, the gap in public information reflects a deliberate privacy push – but one that leaves an incomplete picture of how the allegations affected those closest to him.

The implication: the personal cost of the case remains partially hidden from public view.

What happened to Ben Roberts-Smith’s appeal?

Appeal arguments and grounds

  • Roberts-Smith lodged an appeal in 2024 on 16 grounds, arguing the trial judge erred and that journalist Nick McKenzie had engaged in misconduct (Banco).
  • The Full Court of the Federal Court heard the matter and dismissed every ground, finding each “inconsistent with or unsupported by the evidence at trial” (Banco).

Court ruling and dismissal

In May 2025, the Full Court unanimously dismissed the appeal and also rejected the application to reopen the case based on alleged McKenzie misconduct (Banco).

Consequences of the failed appeal

Roberts-Smith then sought special leave to appeal to the High Court. On 4 September 2025, the High Court refused the application, effectively ending all civil avenues (ABC News). He now faces the criminal case without the shield of a quashed defamation verdict.

Bottom line: Every legal challenge Roberts-Smith mounted to overturn the civil finding has failed. The defamation ruling stands, and it will almost certainly feature in the criminal proceedings as a factual backdrop.

The implication: Roberts-Smith has exhausted all civil remedies and must now defend himself in criminal court.

Who blew the whistle on Ben Roberts-Smith?

Key whistleblowers and their backgrounds

  • The whistleblowers were former SAS soldiers who served alongside Roberts-Smith in Afghanistan. Their identities were largely redacted in court documents, though some testified openly in the defamation trial (Banco).
  • One anonymous whistleblower told media outlets about specific incidents that later formed the core of the murder allegations (BBC News).

Protection and legal consequences for whistleblowers

Whistleblowers face potential risks to their own legal standing and safety. The AFP and OSI have offered protections, but the case has exposed deep divisions within the SAS community (ABC News).

Media investigations that amplified the claims

The investigative reporting by Nick McKenzie, Chris Masters, and David Wroe for The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald turned internal military speculation into public record. The Lieber Institute noted that the case “confirmed Australian war crimes in Afghanistan in civil court” (Lieber Institute at West Point).

The pattern: without whistleblowers willing to break the SAS code of silence, the allegations might never have reached a courtroom.

Timeline

  • – Born in Perth, Australia
  • – Joined Australian Regular Army
  • – Multiple tours in Afghanistan
  • – Awarded Victoria Cross
  • – Media reports of war crimes emerge
  • – Files defamation lawsuit against media
  • – Defamation trial verdict – allegations found substantially true
  • – Appeal dismissed
  • – Arrested by AFP and OSI on war crime charges

What we know and what remains unclear

Confirmed facts

  • Five murder charges laid by AFP and OSI (BBC News)
  • Defamation trial found allegations substantially true (Banco)
  • Appeal dismissed (Banco)
  • Ben Roberts-Smith is a former SAS soldier and Victoria Cross recipient (ABC News)

What’s unclear

  • Exact identities of whistleblowers (some redacted) (Banco)
  • Current partner’s name
  • Full details of the criminal trial timeline (BBC News)

Key quotes from the case

“I am satisfied that the imputations that the applicant committed acts of murder in Afghanistan are substantially true.”

— Justice Anthony Besanko, cited by Banco

“This is a matter of profound national importance – the conduct of Australian soldiers in Afghanistan must be above reproach.”

— Andrew Hastie (MP, former SAS), as reported by ABC News

“He was a killer – he enjoyed it.”

— Anonymous whistleblower, quoted by BBC News

The trajectory of Ben Roberts-Smith from decorated war hero to criminal defendant is a cautionary tale about the gap between public image and private action. For Australian society, the choice is clear: either the justice system holds its most elite soldiers accountable, or the trust placed in the military will erode further. The coming criminal trial will determine not just one man’s fate, but whether Australia can truly reckon with the conduct of its special forces in Afghanistan.

Additional sources

en.wikipedia.org, bennettlaw.com.au, reddit.com, lieber.westpoint.edu, youtube.com, facebook.com, latrobe.edu.au, bbc.com

The defamation trial’s findings paved the way for his arrest and charges, marking a dramatic fall from grace for the former Victoria Cross recipient.

Don't miss these

Frequently asked questions

Is Ben Roberts-Smith in jail?

He was arrested on 7 April 2026 and is currently in custody pending pre-trial proceedings. Bail status is not publicly confirmed.

What is the penalty for war crimes under Australian law?

Under the Commonwealth Criminal Code, war crimes can carry penalties of up to life imprisonment, depending on the specific offence.

How did the media cover the defamation trial?

Major outlets including ABC News, the BBC, and The Sydney Morning Herald provided extensive courtroom reporting, with the trial often treated as a blockbuster scandal.

Has Ben Roberts-Smith been stripped of his Victoria Cross?

No. The Victoria Cross has not been formally revoked, though a government review of the honour system has been discussed.

What did the judge say in the verdict?

Justice Besanko found that the imputations of murder were substantially true, describing the evidence as “compelling and cogent.”

Can Ben Roberts-Smith appeal again?

His appeal to the Full Federal Court was dismissed, and the High Court refused special leave. No further civil appeals remain.

Who are the other soldiers implicated in the allegations?

Several other SAS members have been named in court documents or media reports, but no further criminal charges have been publicly announced as of early 2026.

Related reading: Unmanned combat aerial vehicle guide · Code of silence TV series episodes